Wyatt’s Rebellion 1554

Posted By claire on January 22, 2012

Allington Castle

Allington Castle

On 22nd January 1554, Thomas Wyatt the Younger met with fellow conspirators at his home of Allington Castle in Kent to make final plans for their uprising against Mary I and her decision to marry Philip of Spain.

As Ian W Archer explains in his article about Thomas Wyatt, “The anomalous position of a king regnant crystallized fears about how Philip might use his powers within England; the possibility that England might become another Habsburg milch cow was very real; and there was a real risk of a succession struggle on Mary’s death” and even members of Mary I’s privy council were concerned about the Spanish match and were putting forward Edward Courtenay, Earl of Devon, as a match.

In November 1553, Parliament tried to dissuade Mary from her marriage plans but she had made up her mind and some men decided that a military coup might be the only way to prevent Mary’s marriage. On the 26th November 1553, a group of men including Wyatt, Sir Peter Carew, Sir Edward Rogers, Sir Edward Warner, Sir William Pickering, Sir Nicholas Throckmorton, Sir James Croft, Sir George Harper, Nicholas Arnold, William Thomas, and William Winter, met in London. Archer writes of how the leader at this point was probably Croft and not Wyatt.

In December, the rebel group was joined by Henry Grey, Duke of Suffolk and father of Lady Jane Grey, and plans were put into action: “a fourfold rising scheduled for Palm Sunday (18 March): Carew would raise the west country, Croft Herefordshire, Suffolk the midlands, and Wyatt Kent”, but there were disagreements over the fine details, with William Thomas promoting the idea that Mary should be assassinated, something which Wyatt did not agree with. The plan was to depose Mary I and replace her with her half-sister Elizabeth who would marry Courtenay.

Unfortunately, by the end of December 1553 the privy council heard that trouble was brewing and Edward Courtenay spilled the beans to Stephen Gardiner, Bishop of Winchester, on the 21st January. The rebels were forced into action earlier than planned and while Carew spread dissent in Devon, Wyatt called a meeting at Allington on the 22nd January 1554 to organise the Kent uprising. Three days later, on the 25th January, Wyatt “raised his standard in Maidstone and his supporters made simultaneous proclamations in Rochester, Tonbridge, Malling, and Milton”. On the 28th January, Mary I’s government sent 600 men from London to Kent under the leadership of Thomas Howard, 3rd Duke of Norfolk, but they were far outnumbered by Wyatt’s forces and many men mutinied, joining the rebels. On the 30th January, Wyatt and his men besieged Cooling Castle, owned by George Brooke, 9th Baron Cobham, who had withdrawn to his castle after the Duke of Nrofolk’s forces had mutinied and dispersed. According to C S Knighton’s article on Cobham, he claimed that he had fought valiantly against the rebesl for seven hours before surrendering to them but Knighton points out that his resistance was actually a “pretence” and he joined the rebels. Things were looking good for Wyatt who then marched on to London.

Thomas Wyatt the Younger

By the time Wyatt had reached London on 3rd February 1554, Mary I had rallied her troops with a rousing speech given at Guildhall on the 1st February and Wyatt found the City guarded and barricaded. Wyatt changed his plan, moving from Southwark to Kingston, and was successful in entering Kingston on the 6th February. There, he encountered problems: the bridge over the Thames needed repairing before it could be crossed and his siege artillery became bogged down and had to be abandoned. Archer writes of how “Some observers doubted the loyalty of the queen’s commanders, as they apparently let Wyatt advance unmolested” but Wyatt was left alone because he was actually being “lured into a trap”. By the time Wyatt and his troops reached Ludgate, Mary’s force had barred the gates and the rebels were forced into turning around and heading to Temple Bar where Mary’s troops were waiting for them. With his men surrendering and swearing allegiance to the Queen, Wyatt was forced to surrender and he was arrested by Sir Maurice Berkeley and taken to the Tower of London.

Thomas Wyatt the Younger was tried at Westminster Hall on the 15th March. He denied plotting the assassination of Mary I and refused to implicate Elizabeth. He was found guilty of treason and was executed on the 11th April 1554. He was beheaded and then his body was quartered and his bowels and genitals burned. His head and the quarters of his body were then taken to Newgate where they were parboiled, nailed up and the head placed on a gibbet at St James’s. It is not known what happened to his head, as it disappeared from the gibbet.

Elizabeth was taken to the Tower on the 18th March – see The Imprisonment of Elizabeth – and imprisoned while Mary’s council tried to implicate her in the rebellion. She was released in May 1554 but Lady Jane Grey, whose father had been involved in the rebellion, was not so lucky: she and her husband, Guildford Dudley, were executed on the 12th February 1554. Henry Grey, Duke of Suffolk, was executed on the 23rd February 1554.

Notes and Sources

  • Ian W. Archer, ‘Wyatt, Sir Thomas (b. in or before 1521, d. 1554)’, Oxford Dictionary of National Biography, Oxford University Press, 2004
  • C. S. Knighton, ‘Brooke, George, ninth Baron Cobham (c.1497–1558)’, Oxford Dictionary of National Biography, Oxford University Press, 2004


5 Responses to “Wyatt’s Rebellion 1554”

  1. Dawn says:

    Out of curiosity Claire, do you think that a large part of Mary’s insistance that she would marry Philip no matter what, apart from the fact he was catholic, was that he was Spanish, another way to feel close to her mother whom she was separated from so callously and loved so dearly.. just a thought

  2. James says:

    Eh, sorry Dawn, it’s me again. I just thought it was interesting you thought that, I also think that his being Spanish was part of the reason for her adamant decision…any part of Charles V family she would have been happy with, but Philip, in being Spanish must have been absolute. I know you asked Claire, but I thought this as well.

  3. Claire says:

    Yes, I think that the Spanish link was important to Mary. The Emperor had been there for her when she thought she was going to have to flee England and go into exile and his ambassador Chapuys had always been there for her. Spain was part of who she was and Spain and the Empire had been there for her when she needed them.

  4. Dawn says:

    Oh no!! not you again James lol. 🙂 no need to be sorry, its nice to know we can agree on one thing, at least! Thanks for both your replies.

  5. BanditQueen says:

    It seems to me a) it was one of a knights son’s business to dictate to the Queen whom she should marry and b) Thomas Wyatt the Younger was against Mary Tudor as the daughter of Katherine of Aragon, the rival to the lover of his father, Queen Anne Boleyn, so he was against her to begin with.

    Typically Wyatt and his companions stirred things up to a hysterical outcry by their false claims, based more on their own fears and imaginings rather than factual information as often happens when foreigners are involved in this stupid country. Mary had already made a pledge that Philip would have no dealings with the ruling of the country and the Wyatt rising was an excuse to remove Mary and replace her with Elizabeth, her bastard half sister, as Mary saw it. He wrote to Elizabeth and tried to get her support. Although she would not support his wanting to displace Mary, she did know of his intentions and should have warned her sister about the plot. Thus Elizabeth was guilty of misprison of treason and got off lightly just being placed in the Tower.

    Wyatt made a persuasive argument but it was based on no facts and was just him being hysterical and fearing something that was not yet happening. The burning of Protestants would have happened no matter who was on the throne: it was common practice to burn heretics as they were called, and even Edward burned them. Henry VIII certainly did and on the continent it was wide spread. It was not as yet unpopular as it had not yet begun!

    It was the concentration in the south and the south east and many being taken to London, and the fact that it spread to ordinary men and women that made the burning of heretics unpopular. At this time in her reign Mary was still listening to her people and still very popular. It was Mary who first did the thing with the wedding ring and said that she was married to England, showed them her coronation ring and called the English her children. The cause of Wyatt was soon lost and by the time he had to go all around the world to get into London, Mary was on her way and he surrendered. He was tortured, but not unusual, and confessed, again, he could hardly deny it: and was according to the law at the time, justly executed.

    We may think he was not justly executed, but he was if you realise that he led a rebellion against the anointed Queen. We do not see our Queen as put to rule by God, but she was still anointed at her coronation and blessed and took an oath to defend the religion and the freedoms of the land. It is the same oath taken by Mary Tudor, and yet our Queen does not rule, as Parliament has rightly limited her power. But in those days they did and England had to accept that. Wyatt was not protesting with banners, he had an army ready to remove and kill Mary if he had to. That is how she would have seen this rising. He was also not leading a religious or economic rising as in the Pilgrimage of Grace in 1536 or the Prayer Book risings of 1549. It was what it was: high treason, and Wyatt the Younger paid the price. That’s life! Tough!

Leave a Reply

Please note: Comment moderation is currently enabled so there will be a delay between when you post your comment and when it shows up. Patience is a virtue; there is no need to re-submit your comment.