Mary Queen of Scots – Part Two

This post carries on from Mary Queen of Scots – Part One, a two-part article commemorating the anniversary of the execution of Mary Queen of Scots.

On the 29th October, Parliament met to discuss the fate of Mary Queen of Scots. Alison Weir writes of how Parliament “unanimously ratified the commissioners’ verdict” and demanded the execution of Mary. On the 12th November, a delegation of 40 MPs and 20 peers presented Elizabeth with a petition demanding that “a just sentence might be followed by as just an execution”.

Elizabeth, who had distanced herself from Parliament, was still indecisive and still could not bring herself to act against “her own sex and kin”, saying “I tell you that in this late Act of Parliament you have laid a hard hand on me, that I must give directions for her death, which cannot be but a most grievous and irksome burden to me.” Instead of giving Parliament the answer they wanted, she stalled again, saying that she would pray about the matter. On 24th November, Parliament again requested that Elizabeth sanction the execution but again she stalled, writing in reply:-

“Since it is now resolved that my surety cannot be established without a princess’s head, full grievous is the way that I, who have in my time pardoned so many rebels and winked at so many treasons, should now be forced to this proceeding against such a person. What, will my enemies not say, that for the safety of her life a maiden queen could be content to spill the blood even of her own kinswoman? I may therefore well complain that any man should think me given to cruelty, whereof I am so guiltless and innocent. Nay, I am so far from it that for mine own life I would not touch her. If other means might be found out, [I would take more pleasure] than in any other thing under the sun.”

and then concluded with what Alison Weir quite rightly describes as “a typically obscure statement”:-

“If I should say unto you that I mean not to grant your petition, by my faith I should say unto you more than perhaps I mean. And if I should say unto you I mean to grant your petition, I should then tell you more than is fit for you to know. I am not so void of judgement as not to see mine own peril, nor so careless as not to weigh that my life daily is in hazard. But since so many have both written and spoken against me, I pray you to accept my thankfulness, to excuse my doubtfulness, and to take in good part my answer answerless.”

What??? Can’t you just picture William Cecil banging his head against a brick wall? I can! On that same day, Elizabeth drafted a formal proclamation of Mary’s sentence but before it could be published Elizabeth sent a message stopping it and adjourning Parliament for a week. After the commissioners met again in the Star Chamber and formally condemned Mary to death, Parliament met on the 2nd December where a draft proclamation of sentence, written by Elizabeth and Burghley, was published. Walsingham drafted a warrant for the execution but it seemed that any celebrating was premature as Elizabeth was reluctant to sign the warrant.

Weir describes Elizabeth’s dilemma:-

“If she signed the warrant she would be setting a precedent for condemning an anointed queen to death, and would also be spilling the blood of her kinswoman. To do this would court the opprobroum of the whole world, and might provoke the Catholic powers to vengeful retribution. Yet, if she showed mercy, Mary would remain the focus of Catholic plotting for the rest of her life, to the great peril of Elizabeth and her kingdom. Elizabeth knew where her duty lay, but she did no want to be responsible for Mary’s death.”

She was caught between a rock and a hard place!

The Davison Debacle

After months of stress, near breakdown and using delay tactic after delay tactic, Elizabeth finally took action on the 1st February 1587, calling for Sir William Davison. According to Davison, Elizabeth read Mary’s death warrant, signed it and told him that she wished the execution to take place in the Great Hall of Fotheringhay Castle without delay, for she was disturbed by reports of an attempt to rescue Mary. As instructed, Davison asked Sir Christopher Hatton, the acting Lord Chancellor, to seal the warrant with the Great Seal of England to validate it. The next day, the Queen called for Davison and asked him not to take the warrant to Hatton. When Davison explained that it was too late, that the warrant had been sealed, Elizabeth seemed to panic and asked him why he had been in such a hurry. A worried Davison went straight to Hatton and then the two men hurried to Lord Burghley, fearing that Elizabeth was about to change her mind. According to Weir, Burghley was resolute and decided that no councillor should discuss the matter with Elizabeth until Mary had been executed. He then drafted an order for the sentence to be carried out and all ten councillors agreed to share the responsibility for it, in case Davison was blamed. The order was then copied and sent to Fotheringhay on the 4th February along with the warrant signed by Elizabeth.

Elizabeth’ story of the warrant differs from Davison’s. She claimed that she had signed the warrant and then asked Davison not to disclose this fact to anyone. When she learned that it had been sealed with the Great Seal, she then asked Davison to swear on his life that he would not let the warrant out of his hands unless he had permission from her.

Had Davison misunderstood the Queen’s instructions and intentions? Probably not. Some historians believe that Burghley chose Davison to be a scapegoat because he realised that Elizabeth needed someone to take the responsibility for Mary’s death away from her, but others believe that it was Elizabeth who chose Davison as the scapegoat. Weir believes the second theory because she points out that Burghley would not have seen Davison, a man whom he respected and liked and who was good at his job, as being expendable.

Weir also gives further details of the Davison episode. Apparently, after signing the warrant, Elizabeth had asked Davison to ask Paulet if he could get rid of Mary and ease her of her burden, so that she could announce Mary’s death by natural causes and not be forced into executing her. Davison was shocked by this idea but agreed to ask Paulet who replied by saying that he would not commit murder and that Mary should be executed lawfully. It is interesting that Elizabeth found it so hard to sign the warrant but would happily (well, ok, not happily!) order the Scots Queen’s murder!

While Elizabeth was worrying about Paulet, Mary’s death warrant arrived at Fotheringhay and Paulet told Mary that her execution was set for he next day, the 8th February, at 8 o’clock in the morning. Mary spent her evening writing farewell letters, giving instructions regarding the disposal of her belongings and praying.

At 8 o’clock on the morning of the 8th February 1587, Mary Queen of Scots was taken to the Great Hall of Fotheringhay Castle. She was escorted by her ladies, her apothecary, her surgeon, the master of her household and the Sheriff of Northampton. Three hundred spectators filled the hall and watched as the dignified Mary Stuart entered the room and approached the scaffold which was covered with straw and draped with black cloth. Here is a description of the Scots Queen:-

“On her head a dressing of lawn edged with bone lace; a pomander chain and an Agnus Dei; about her neck a crucifix of gold; and in her hand a crucifix of bone with a wooden cross, and a pair of beads at her girdle, with a medal in the end of them; a veil of lawn fasyened to her caul, bowed out with wire, and edged round about with bone lace. A gown of black satin, printed, with long sleeves to the ground, set with buttons of jet and trimmed with pearl, and short sleeves of satin, cut with a pair of sleeves of purple velvet.”

On approaching the scaffold, Mary turned to her ladies and said: “Thou hast cause rather to joy than to mourn, for now shalt thou see Mary Stuart’s troubles receive their long-expected end.”

As the Dean of Peterborough prayed aloud, Mary read her Catholic Latin prayers in a louder voice, attempting to block out his protestant prayers. Then, refusing the help of the executioner and his assistant, saying “I was not wont to have my clothes plucked off by such grooms, nor did I ever put off my clothes before such a company”, Mary took off her black gown to reveal a bodice and petticoat of scarlet, the colour of martyrs. By wearing red, she was proclaiming that she was to die as a Catholic martyr.

The executioner then knelt and begged her forgiveness for what he had to do and Mary replied bravely “I hope you shall make an end of all my troubles.” She then knelt, laid her head on the block before her and repeated “In manuas tuas, Domine, confide spiritum meum” meaning “Into Thy hands, O Lord, I commend my spirit”. Alison Weir writes that it took two blows of the axe to sever Mary’s head and that it was reported that her lips carried on moving for 15 minutes afterwards. Lady Antonia Fraser also writes that it took two blows to kill Mary. Weir continues to describe how the executioner then picked up Mary’s head by the hair, as was custom, but that her lawn cap fell off along with a red wig, revealing that Mary’s real hair was grey and “polled very short”. Weir also retells the story of Mary’s dog, saying that when the executioner went to remove Mary’s clothes, as had been ordered:-

“he found her little dog under her coat, which, being put from thence, went and laid himself down betwixt her head and body, and being besmeared with her blood, was caused to be washed…”

On Walsingham’s orders, Mary’s head and body were then encased in lead and put inside a heavy coffin.

Although London rejoiced at the news of the execution, Elizabeth did not. When she was given the news at 9am the next day, “Her countenance changed, her words faltered, and with excessive sorrow she was in a manner astonished, insomuch as she gave herself over to grief, putting herself into mourning weeds and shedding abundance of tears”. So great was Elizabeth’s fury that Walsingham fled to his home, pretending to be ill and Leicester and Burghley were banished. Poor Davison, the scapegoat, was arrested, tried and sentenced to imprisonment in the Tower and heavily fined. Burghley managed to rescue the poor man from being hanged.

Elizabeth then had to deal with the aftermath of Mary’s execution which included the Pope calling for Philip of Spain to invade England as soon as possible and Henry III of France calling Elizabeth “this bastard and shameless harlot”, but by April things had calmed down and there seemed that there were to be no reprisals from Catholic Europe.

On 30th July 1587, Mary Queen of Scots was collected from Fotheringhay Castle and buried at Peterborough Cathedral with the royal honours deserving of a queen. In 1612, Mary’s son, King James I, ordered that his mother should be moved from Peterborough to Westminster Abbey and it is there that she can be found today, in a chapel opposite that of the woman who signed her death warrant, Elizabeth I.

Sources

• “Elizabeth, the Queen” by Alison Weir
• “Elizabeth’s Women” by Tracy Borman

Related posts:

Mary Queen of Scots – Part One The Execution of Mary Queen of Scots – 8th February 1587 The Trial of Mary Queen of Scots 8 February 1587 – Mary Queen of Scots is Executed Mary Queen of Scots Marries Lord Darnley Mary Queen of Scots – Tragic Heroine? 8 February 1587 – The Execution of Mary, Queen of Scots Mary, Queen of Scots – 8th December 1542 14th October 1586 – Trial of Mary Queen of Scots 24 April 1558 – Mary Queen of Scots Marries the Dauphin Mary Queen of Scots The “Bosom Serpent” and Gloriana