The Execution of Mary Queen of Scots – 8th February 1587

Posted By claire on February 8, 2011

Mary Queen of Scots executionOn this day in history, Wednesday 8th February 1587, Mary Queen of Scots was executed at Fotheringhay Castle.The warrant for her death had arrived the day before and Sir Amyas Paulet, Mary’s gaoler, wasted no time in arranging Mary’s execution. Historian John Guy writes of how Paulet, his assistant Sir Drue Dury, and the Earls of Shrewsbury and Kent, barged into Mary’s room, Paulet tore down her cloth of state, and then the warrant for Mary’s execution was read out to her1. A worried Mary was reassured by Drury that she would not be quietly murdered like Richard II, saying,”Madam, you need not fear it, for that you are in the charge of a Christian Queen.” Guy points out that Mary would not have been so reassured if she had known that Elizabeth had intended for Mary to be assassinated and that “she owed the relative privilege of a public execution almost entirely to the standpoint of Cecil and Walsingham.”2

Mary thanked the men for their news, crossing herself and saying “I am quite ready and very happy to die, and to shed my blood for Almighty God, my Saviour and my Creator, and for the Catholic Church, and to maintain its rights in this country”, obviously seeing herself as a martyr. She then asked for her chaplain, a request which was denied her, and then set about preparing herself for her death. She prayed, made her will, distributed her belongings between her ladies and servants, and then wrote some letters of farewell. Her final letter was to her brother-in-law, Henry III of France, and John Guy describes how “beautifully scripted” the letter is, although there are some blotches which “may mark the places where her tears fell”. She wrote:-

“Today, after dinner, I was advised of my sentence. I am to be executed like a criminal at eight o’clock in the morning. I haven’t had enough time to give you a full account of what has happened, but if you will listen to my physician and my other sorrowful servants you will know the truth, and how, thanks be to God, I scorn death and faithfully protest that I face it innocent of any crime…

The Catholic faith and the defence of my God-given right to the English throne are the two reasons for which I am condemned, and yet they will not allow me to say that it is for the Catholic faith that I die…

I beg you as most Christian Majesty, my brother-in-law and old friend, who have always protested your love for me, to give proof now of your kindness on all these points: both by paying charitably my unfortunate servants their arrears of wages (this is a burden on my conscience that you alone can relieve) and also by having prayers offered to God for a Queen who has herself been called Most Christian, and who dies a Catholic, stripped of all her possessions…

Concerning my son, I commend him to you inasmuch as he deserves it, as I cannot answer for him…

I venture to send you two precious stones, amulets against illness, trusting that you will enjoy good health and a long and happy life.”3

It is a moving letter, written by a woman who was ready to face her death with courage and a strong faith but who was clearly worried about her servants. She was obviously a loving woman.

At 6am on the 8th February, Mary rose, after spending most of the night writing letters, and her will was read out to her household. She then said her farewells to her staff and began to pray, her prayer being interrupted by the Earls of Shrewsbury and Kent, and Thomas Andrews, Sheriff of Northamptonshire. They had come to escort her to the great hall. Mary grabbed her prayer book and her ivory crucifix and made her way to the place of her death, a hall filled with around three hundred spectators.

Alison Weir, in her book “Elizabeth the Queen”, quotes a contemporary description on Mary Queen of Scots on that fateful days:-

“On her head a dressing of lawn edged with bone lace; a pomander chain and an Agnus Dei; about her neck a crucifix of gold; and in her hand a crucifix of bone with a wooden cross, and a pair of beads at her girdle, with a medal in the end of them; a veil of lawn fasyened to her caul, bowed out with wire, and edged round about with bone lace. A gown of black satin, printed, with long sleeves to the ground, set with buttons of jet and trimmed with pearl, and short sleeves of satin, cut with a pair of sleeves of purple velvet.”4

Mary approached the straw covered scaffold, turned to her loyal ladies and said “Thou hast cause rather to joy than to mourn, for now shalt thou see Mary Stuart’s troubles receive their long-expected end.” As the Dean of Peterborough prayed aloud in English, Mary read her Catholic Latin prayers louder, and then refusing the help of the executioner, took off her black gown to reveal a scarlet bodice and petticoat. The vivid scarlet of her clothes proclaimed that she was considered herself a martyr to the Catholic faith.

The executioner knelt before the Queen of the Scots, begging her forgiveness, and then Mary knelt, laying her head on the block ready, repeating “In manuas tuas, Domine, confide spiritum meum”, “Into Thy hands, O Lord, I commend my spirit.” The executioner then did the deed, although it took him two blows to kill Mary. Alison Weir5 writes of how, when the executioner picked up Mary’s head to show the crowd, her cap and wig fell off, revealing cropped grey hair. Also, when the executioner went to remove the clothes from the body “he found her little dog under her coat, which, being put from thence, went and laid himself down betwixt her head and body, and being besmeared with her blood, was caused to be washed…”

That was the end of Mary Queen of Scots, the woman some see as a tragic heroine and martyr, and others see as an ambitious, reckless fool with poor judgement when it came to men. I love John Guy’s final words on Mary when he finishes his biography not with her death, but with her walking to her execution:-

“This was the moment. She had been the star of so many glittering spectacles during her life, beginning with her wedding to the Dauphin at Notre Dame when she was not yet sixteen, and she knew that she could keep her nerve. Her most compelling act of theatre awaited her. She stepped forward and crossed the threshold. The rest, whatever view is taken of the extent to which she truly ranks as a martyr for the Catholic faith and for the ideal of monarch, for ever settles her place in the pantheon of history as a fully realized tragic heroine.”6

But did Mary get the last laugh? On the 24th March 1603 it was her son, her flesh and blood, James VI of Scotland, who inherited the throne from Elizabeth I and became James I of England. I’m sure that Mary must have been rolling in her grave at the harsh measures which her son took against Catholics during his reign, but it was a Stewart (Stuart) on the throne of England, Mary’s destiny had been fulfilled.

You can read more about Mary in the following articles:

Notes and Sources

  1. My Heart is My Own: The Life of Mary Queen of Scots, John Guy, p498-499
  2. Ibid., p499
  3. Ibid., p501
  4. “Elizabeth, the Queen”, Alison Weir, p379
  5. Ibid., p379
  6. Guy, p502


16 Responses to “The Execution of Mary Queen of Scots – 8th February 1587”

  1. Alan Fisk says:

    I’m surprised that she wasn’t executed long before. The Scots certainly have deposed her if she had stayed in Scotland (their romantic attachment to Mary began much later). Although, as an English Catholic, I am not an admirer of Elizabeth, I think that Mary has a strong claim to the title of ‘most ungrateful person in history’.

  2. Christine says:

    In the wake of the Ridolfi Plot and St. Bartholomew’s Massacre, there was a “top-secret” agreement in 1572 between Elizabeth/Leicester/Cecil (the only persons who knew about it) and the then Scottish government to extradite Mary and to execute her as soon as she crossed the border. The whole plot misfired only because the Scottish regent was murdered unexpectedly.

  3. Mary had the greater claim the the English throne than did Good Queen Bess because of Elizabeth was illegtimate by birth and was so considered by the courts and councils of Europe.

  4. Kara says:

    May she rest in peace still all these years later. I never knew about the chopped “grey” hair, i always imagined it to be short and auburn color for some reason.
    I believe that poor lady never had a chance. I often wonder if Elizabeth I felt bad after?? I bet she secretly did at least in my mind I feel she did.
    And someone above said Elizabeth was never a rightful heir which is BS, Henry VIII made his final will and line to accession with her name written in it. Anne’s blood was well spent for her daughter. Plus Catherine Parr got all Henry’s children back in his graces before he died. Henry loved his daughters at the end of his life, and probably before.

  5. Anne Barnhill says:

    Mary, like her cousin, Elizabeth, continues to fascinate. With Elizabeth, I am in awe of her courage and character–I like her so much and admire her, though she must have driven those men to distraction with her wavering and “answerless answers.” She hated having to do away with Mary and only did so at the intense urging of her ministers, Cecil and Walsingham in particular, both staunch Protestants who feared the Catholic Mary. And, she had plotted often against Elizabeth until the Queen could no longer turn the other way. Mary had to be dealt with.
    That said, Mary’s relationship with men was quite interesting. She, the young widow, Queen of France, conducted relationships that a novelist couldn’t make up! I imagine she was beautiful and her contemporaries said as much–also that she had a voice that could sway any man. She was younger than Elizabeth and probably prettier in the conventional sense. Two queens, cousins–wow! THanks Claire–another great article!

  6. tallulah montegue says:

    What happened to Mary’s little dog after her execution?

  7. Claire says:

    I’m not sure, Tallulah, but I expect her ladies looked after it.

  8. Impish_Impulse says:

    I agree with Kara – Elizabeth certainly was the legitimate heir to the throne; named so by her father, ratified by Parliament.

  9. Sharon says:

    I have read a story, that Mary’s little dog refused to eat after her beheading and died shotly after she did. I do not know if it is true or not. B

  10. Sharon says:

    I have read that Mary’s little dog refused to eat after she was gone and he died shortly after she did. Poor baby. The shock of seeing what happened must have been too much for the little guy.
    Elizabeth, by her father’s will, and an act of Parliament, was the legal claimant and legitimate heir to the throne of England following her brother Edward and her sister Mary.
    Mary Stuart was not a legal claimant according to Henry VIII.

  11. Baroness Von Reis says:

    Mary should have known not to mess with Queen Elizabeth 1 or any of the the Tudors,big mistake. Baroness

  12. Adam says:

    Elizabeth was truly devastated after Mary’s death and just before she was executed wanted it to stop, but it was to late. So sad about Mary’s dog, poor chap 🙁

  13. AnneBoleyn says:

    Poor Mary, it must have been awful to have been imprisoned so many years. I expect after a while she expected life imprisonment, it must have been such a shock to be told she would die the next day. RIP XX Our thoughts are with you XX

  14. Amanda D says:

    In Henry’s will it didn’t include his sister Margaret’s family until after his sister Mary who was one of his favorites. That’s why Edward vi left his throne to lady jane grey. And after Elizabeth the remaining Grey sisters would have claimed the throne. But I believe they both died. So then it left Mary of scots,who was Margaret’s granddaughter, and with her execution her son James became heir.

  15. Judy Goldschmidt says:

    I recently traveled to the UK with my family and toured Hollyroodhouse in Edinburgh and walked through Mary’s rooms. I had read prior to the trip the minister’s account of her death and about her little dog. I became intrigued as a dog lover myself and had this on my mind while touring the palace. Then when I saw that in the boarder of the frieze on the ceiling of her husband’s room, there were two Italian Grayhounds, a larger one with a puppy both chocolate and white, I smiled to myself because these are the very dogs I own. I know it’s a small thing but I was curious about the bread of her dog, I have seen a children’s story that shows the dog as being a Scottish Terrier. thank you

  16. Christine says:

    A very sad story she was a very human woman who was born to be Queen but sadly had none of the attributes, some one once said the Stewarts didn’t know how to rule but they knew how to die, her grandson Charles 1st was also beheaded for making serious blunders, Mary had the misfortune like Lady Jane Grey and Cardinal Pole to have been to closely related to the Tudor Monarchs, Henry V111 with his discarding of both his first two Queens and bastardising both daughters further complicated matters as it gave the followers wether they be Catholic or Protestant a reason for rebellion and putting Jane Grey on the throne as in the case of Mary 1st and then Mary Stewart when Elizabeth was declared Queen, had Henry not bastardised both his daughters in the first place they would not have been any question of Elizabeth being the rightful Queen, he didn’t realise when he done this that he made the throne very shaky for them both, of course he expected Edward to have heirs but that didn’t happen, without realising it he actually made both his daughters futures very uncertain, when Mary landed in England she put Elizabeth in a very difficult position, as a woman she probably would have loved to help her but as Queen she darent

Leave a Reply

Please note: Comment moderation is currently enabled so there will be a delay between when you post your comment and when it shows up. Patience is a virtue; there is no need to re-submit your comment.